Seed Treatment Market Trends and Global Forecasts (2011-2016)

Seed treatment is the fastest growing segment in crop protection market. Seed treatments are further classified as insecticides (chemical), fungicides (chemical), bio-control seed treatments (non-chemical), and other seed treatment chemicals.

Seed treatments are basically segmented further as chemical and non-chemical seed treatments. Bio-based seed treatments – a part of non-chemical seed treatments – are made up of renewable resources and contain natural active ingredients. These seed treatments do not have any negative impact on the environment, workers, and consumers safety comparing to chemical seed treatments and are expected to be one of the fastest growing seed treatment segments in the near future.

Seed Treatment Market Trends and Global Forecasts (2011-2016)

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 382

Price  $4650      

Chemical seed treatments, which are typically manufactured from petrochemical or inorganic raw materials, are further segmented as insecticides, fungicides, and other chemical seed treatments. Globally, the market is dominated by chemical insecticides, accounting for over 52% of the total seed treatment demand in 2010. The global fungicide seed treatments market is expected to reach $1,247.3 million by 2016, growing at a CAGR of 15.2%. The global insecticides seed treatment market is projected to reach $1,591.1 million by 2016, growing at a CAGR of 11.4%

Rising GM seeds prices and cost effectiveness of seed treatments over other crop protection methods are expected to drive the demand for seed treatment market in the near future. However, absence of centralized government regulation for treated seed and seed treatment active ingredient registration expected to hamper the global movement of seeds and ultimately the demand for seed treatments in the next five years.

One of the critical success factors (CSFs) in the market is the ability of a market participant to innovate complete protection solution against various biotic and abiotic stresses in single product. This battle of manufacturing grower-friendly, crop-friendly, and environment-friendly product innovation is going to be one of the key strategies market players are following in seed treatment industry in the next five years.

This report estimates the market size of the global seed treatment market in terms of revenue. The market has been further segmented on the basis of crop types such as cereals and grains, oilseeds, and other crops as well as by sub-segmentation of insecticides, fungicides, and other chemical seed treatments such as plant growth regulators, micronutrients, etc. This segmentation is given for major regions and key countries in those regions. Market drivers, restraints and challenges, and crop trends are discussed in detail. Market share by participants for the overall market is discussed in detail in the report. We have also profiled leading players of this industry including Bayer CropScience (Germany), BASF (Germany), Monsanto (U.S.), and Dow AgroSciences (U.S.).

Scope of the report

This seed treatment market research report categorizes the global market the basis of type, by geography, crop trends, and forecasting revenue and analyzing trends in each of the following submarkets:

• On the basis of Types: Chemical and non-chemical
• On the basis of applications: Insecticides, fungicides, bio-control, and other chemical seed treatments
• On the basis of crop applications: Cereals and grains; oilseeds; and other crops
• On the basis of geography: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and ROW

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION  
1.1 KEY TAKE-AWAYS
1.2 REPORT DESCRIPTION
1.3 MARKETS COVERED
1.4 STAKEHOLDERS
1.5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.5.1 MARKET SIZE
1.5.2 LIST OF SECONDARY DATA SOURCES USED
1.5.3 KEY DATA POINTS FROM PRIMARY SOURCES
1.5.4 ASSUMPTIONS MADE FOR THIS REPORT
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3 MARKET OVERVIEW
  3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 SEED TREATMENT MARKET
3.2.1 COMMERCIAL SEED TREATMENTS
3.2.2 DOWNSTREAM SEED TREATMENTS
3.2.3 GROWER APPLIED SEED TREATMENTS
3.3 GLOBAL SEED MARKET: AN OVERVIEW
3.3.1 TYPES OF SEED
3.3.1.1 Farm-saved seed
3.3.1.2 Seed supplied commercially
3.3.1.2.1 Conventional seed
3.3.1.2.2 GM seed
3.3.2 STAGES IN COMMERCIAL SEED PRODUCTION
3.3.2.1 Foundation or basic seed
3.3.2.2 Certified seed
3.3.3 GLOBAL SEED MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
3.4 EVOLUTION OF SEED TREATMENT MARKET
3.5 WINNING IMPERATIVE
3.5.1 SEED TREATMENT AS A COMPLETE SOLUTION TO SAFEGAURD SEED INVESTMENTS
3.6 BURNING ISSUES
3.6.1 SEED TREATMENT ISSUES IMPACTING INTERNATIONAL SEED MOVEMENTS
3.7 DRIVERS
3.7.1 SEED TREATMENT AS LOW COST CROP PROTECTION SOLUTION
3.7.2 RISING PRICES OF THE GM CROPS CREATING A NEED FOR CROP PROTECTION
3.7.3 RISING WORLD POPULATION & FOOD REQUIREMENTS – “4 F’S(FOOD-FUEL-FEED-FIBER)
3.7.4 REDUCED RISK OF EXCEEDING MINIMUM RESIDUE LEVEL
3.8 RESTRAINTS
3.8.1 DISCOURAGING GOVERNMENT REGULATION
3.8.2 LOW SHELF LIFE & DIFFICULTY IN DISPOSAL OF TREATED SEED
3.9 OPPORTUNITIES
3.9.1 RAPID GROWTH IN BIO-CONTROL SEED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS
3.9.2 STRONG PROGRESS IN NEW & EMERGING MARKETS – LATIN AMERICA & ASIA
3.10 SEED TREATMENT EQUIPMENTS: AN OVERVIEW
3.10.1 CONTINUOUS SYSTEM
3.10.2 BATCH SYSTEM
3.10.3 DUST/POWDER TREATER
3.10.4 SLURRY TREATER
3.10.5 ON-FARM/DIRECT TREATER
3.11 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
3.12 PATENT ANALYSIS
3.12.1 BY REGION
3.12.2 BY YEAR
3.12.3 BY COMPANY
4 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TYPES  
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT
4.2.1 INSECTICIDES
4.2.1.1 Carbamates and organophosphates
4.2.1.2 Pyrethroids
4.2.1.3 Other seed treatment insecticides
4.2.2 FUNGICIDES
4.2.2.1 Benzimidazoles
4.2.2.2 Triazoles and diazoles
4.2.2.3 Dithiocarbamates
4.2.2.4 Others seed treatment fungicides
4.2.3 OTHERS
4.2.3.1 Micronutrients
4.2.3.2 Colorants
4.2.3.3 Polymers
4.2.3.4 Phytohormones
4.2.3.5 Safeners
4.3 NON–CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT
4.3.1 TRADITIONAL SEED TREATMENT
4.3.1.1 Priming and pelleting
4.3.1.2 Hot water treatments
4.3.2 BIO-CONTROL
4.3.2.1 Nematicides
4.3.2.1.1 Harpin
4.3.2.1.1.1 Pros and cons of harpins
4.3.2.1.2 Abamectin
4.3.2.1.3 Spinosad
4.3.3 INOCULANT
4.3.3.1 TYPES OF INOCULANTS
4.3.3.1.1 Rhizobium inoculants
4.3.3.1.2 Azospirillum inoculants
4.3.3.1.3 Other inoculants
4.3.3.1.3.1 Azotobacter
4.3.3.1.3.2 Acetobacter
4.3.3.1.4 Advantages of inoculation
4.3.3.2 Regulations for commercial inoculants
4.3.3.3 Drivers
4.3.3.3.1 Strong demand growth from organic farming and integrated pest management (IPM)
4.3.3.3.2 Integrating bio-control products with conventional chemicals
4.3.3.3.3 Less regulatory pressure & worker/ environment safety
4.3.3.3.4 New acquisitions and partnerships
4.3.3.4 Restraints
4.3.3.4.1 Variable efficiency and low shelf life
4.3.3.5 Opportunities
4.3.3.5.1 Plant extracts and oil-based seed treatments for organic farming
4.3.3.5.2 Seed treatment for abiotic stress
4.3.3.5.3 Thermo-seeds
4.4 SEED TREATMENT – APPLICATION TECHNIQUES
5 SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TARGET PROTECTION  
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 FUNGICIDES
5.2.1 MAIZE/CORN
5.2.2 SOYBEAN
5.2.3 COTTON
5.2.4 WHEAT
5.2.5 POTATO
5.2.6 CANOLA
5.2.7 RICE
5.2.8 VEGETABLES
5.3 INSECTICIDES
5.4 NEMATICIDES
6 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY TARGET CROP  
6.1 INTRODUCTION
6.2 CEREALS & GRAINS
6.2.1 MAIZE/CORN
6.2.2 RICE
6.2.3 WHEAT
6.2.4 SORGHUM
6.3 OILSEEDS
6.3.1 SOYBEAN
6.3.2 SUNFLOWER
6.3.3 COTTON
6.3.4 CANOLA
6.4 OTHERS
6.4.1 TURF/FORAGE GRASSES, ALFALFA
6.4.2 SUGAR BEETS
6.4.3 VEGETABLES
7 SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY GEOGRAPHY  
7.1 INTRODUCTION
7.2 NORTH AMERICA
7.2.1 U.S.
7.2.2 MEXICO
7.2.3 CANADA
7.3 EUROPE
7.3.1 U.K.
7.3.2 ITALY
7.3.3 FRANCE
7.3.4 SWEDEN
7.3.5 GERMANY
7.4 ASIA-PACIFIC
7.4.1 JAPAN
7.4.2 THAILAND
7.4.3 AUSTRALIA
7.4.4 CHINA
7.4.5 INDIA
7.5 LATIN AMERICA
7.5.1 BRAZIL
7.5.2 ARGENTINA
7.6 ROW
7.6.1 RUSSIA
7.6.2 SOUTH AFRICA
8 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE  
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 NEW PRODUCTS DEVELOPMENT – MOST PREFERRED STRATEGIC APPROACH
8.3 KEY MARKET STRATEGIES
8.4 SYNGENTA & BAYER: MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES
8.5 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS
8.6 NEW PRODUCTS LAUNCH & RESEARCH
8.7 PARTNERSHIPS/COLLABORATIONS/JOINT VENTURES/ AGREEMENTS
8.8 EXPANSIONS
9 COMPANY PROFILES  
9.1 A/S CIMBRIA
9.1.1 OVERVIEW
9.1.2 FINANCIALS
9.1.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.1.4 STRATEGY
9.1.5 DEVELOPMENT
9.2 ADVANCED BIOLOGICAL MARKETING (ABM)
9.2.1 OVERVIEW
9.2.2 FINANCIALS
9.2.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.2.4 STRATEGY
9.2.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.3 AGRIHOUSE BRANDS LIMITED
9.3.1 OVERVIEW
9.3.2 FINANCIALS
9.3.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.3.4 STRATEGY
9.3.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.4 ARKION LIFE SCIENCES LLC
9.4.1 OVERVIEW
9.4.2 FINANCIALS
9.4.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.4.4 STRATEGY
9.4.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.5 ASTEC GLOBAL
9.5.1 OVERVIEW
9.5.2 FINANCIALS
9.5.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.5.4 STRATEGY
9.5.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.6 BASF SE
9.6.1 OVERVIEW
9.6.2 FINANCIALS
9.6.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.6.4 STRATEGY
9.6.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.7 BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG
9.7.1 OVERVIEW
9.7.2 FINANCIALS
9.7.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.7.4 STRATEGY
9.7.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.8 BECKER UNDERWOOD INC
9.8.1 OVERVIEW
9.8.2 FINANCIAL
9.8.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.8.4 STRATEGY
9.8.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.9 BRETTYOUNG LIMITED
9.9.1 OVERVIEW
9.9.2 FINANCIALS
9.9.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.9.4 STRATEGY
9.9.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.10 CHEMTURA CORPORATION
9.10.1 OVERVIEW
9.10.2 FINANCIALS
9.10.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.10.4 STRATEGY
9.10.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.11 E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
9.11.1 OVERVIEW
9.11.2 FINANCIALS
9.11.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.11.4 STRATEGY
9.11.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.12 GERMAINS SEED TECHNOLOGY
9.12.1 OVERVIEW
9.12.2 FINANCIALS
9.12.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.12.4 STRATEGY
9.12.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.13 INCOTEC GROUP BV
9.13.1 OVERVIEW
9.13.2 FINANCIALS
9.13.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.13.4 STRATEGY
9.13.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.14 LANDEC AG INCORPORATION
9.14.1 OVERVIEW
9.14.2 FINANCIALS
9.14.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.14.4 STRATEGY
9.14.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.15 MONSANTO COMPANY
9.15.1 OVERVIEW
9.15.2 FINANCIALS
9.15.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.15.4 STRATEGY
9.15.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.16 NOROGARD AB
9.16.1 OVERVIEW
9.16.2 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.16.3 FINANCIALS
9.16.4 STRATEGY
9.16.5 DEVELOPMENTS:
9.17 NOVOZYMES A/S
9.17.1 OVERVIEW
9.17.2 FINANCIALS
9.17.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.17.4 STRATEGY
9.17.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.18 NUFARM LIMITED
9.18.1 OVERVIEW
9.18.2 FINANCIALS
9.18.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.18.4 STRATEGY
9.18.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.19 PLANT HEALTH CARE PLC
9.19.1 OVERVIEW
9.19.2 FINANCIALS
9.19.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.19.4 STRATEGY
9.19.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.20 PRECISION LABORATORIES INCORPORATION
9.20.1 OVERVIEW
9.20.2 FINANCIALS
9.20.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.20.4 STRATEGY
9.20.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.21 SYNGENTA AG
9.21.1 OVERVIEW
9.21.2 FINANCIALS
9.21.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.21.4 STRATEGY
9.21.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.22 VALENT U.S.A. CORPORATION
9.22.1 OVERVIEW
9.22.2 FINANCIALS
9.22.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.22.4 STRATEGY
9.22.5 DEVELOPMENTS
9.23 WOLF TRAX INCORPORATION
9.23.1 OVERVIEW
9.23.2 FINANCIALS
9.23.3 PRODUCTS & SERVICES
9.23.4 STRATEGY
9.23.5 DEVELOPMENTS
APPENDIX   
U.S. PATENTS
EUROPE PATENTS
JAPAN PATENTS
LIST OF TABLES   
TABLE 1 SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 2 SEED TREATMENT MARKET TYPES & BENEFITS
TABLE 3 PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF SEED TREATMENT ON SEED QUALITY
TABLE 4 GLOBAL SEED MARKET REVENUE, 2001 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 5 SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2001 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 6 SEED TREATMENT: UPCOMING PRODUCT INNOVATIONS & PROPOSED PRODUCT LAUNCHES
TABLE 7 SEED TREATMENT AS COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTION
TABLE 8 WORLD POPULATION & PER CAPITA LAND AVAILABLE
TABLE 9 SEED TREATMENT FUNGICIDES
TABLE 10 SEED TREATMENT INSECTICIDES
TABLE 11 SEED TREATMENT EQUIPMENTS, BY GUSTAFSON (BAYER CROPSCIENCE)
TABLE 12 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 13 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016($MILLION)
TABLE 14 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT INSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION MARKET VOLUME, BY CHEMICAL CLASS, 2009 (KILO TONS)
TABLE 15 COMMERCIAL ACTIVE INGREDIENTS-CARBAMATE SEED TREATMENTS
TABLE 16 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SEED TREATMENT PRODUCTS BY ACTIVE INGREDIENT, BY CROPS
TABLE 17 COMMON SEED TREATMENT FUNGICIDES
TABLE 18 SEED TREATMENT FUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION MARKET VOLUME, BY CHEMICAL CLASS, 2009 (KILO TONS)
TABLE 19 COMMERCIAL ACTIVE INGREDIENTS – BENZIMIDAZOLES
TABLE 20 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE TRIAZOLE SEED TREATMENT PRODUCTS, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENT
TABLE 21 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE SEED TREATMENT PRODUCTS, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENT
TABLE 22 MICRONUTRIENTS BENEFITS
TABLE 23 RELATIVE RESPONSIVENESS OF SELECTED CROPS TO MICRONUTRIENTS
TABLE 24 HOT WATER SEED TREATMENT, BY CROP
TABLE 25 COMMERCIAL BIO-CONTROL SEED TREATMENTS, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENT
TABLE 26 COMMERCIAL NEMATICIDES, BY ACTIVE INGREDIENT, BY CROPS
TABLE 27 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE INOCULANTS, BY CROPS, BY DOSAGES
TABLE 28 RHIZOBIUM INOCULANTS, BY CROPS
TABLE 29 NITROGEN FIXING CAPACITY OF AZOSPIRILLUMN, BY CROPS
TABLE 30 AREA UNDER LEGUME CROPS, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2008 – 2009 (HA)
TABLE 31 SAVING CHEMICAL NUTRIENTS BY USE OF INOCULANTS
TABLE 32 ORGANIC MATERIAL REVIEW INSTITUTE (OMRI) – APPROVED INOCULANTS
TABLE 33 CHEMISTRY & BIO-CONTROL COMBINATION
TABLE 34 MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION (MIC) OF ESSENTIAL OILS FOR SEED TREATMENT (PPM)
TABLE 35 EFFECT OF THERMAL SEED TREATMENT, BY CROPS, BY PATHOGENS
TABLE 36 SEED TREATMENT APPLICATION TECHNIQUES, BY CROPS
TABLE 37 IMPORTANT PATHOGENS AS SEED TREATMENT TARGETS
TABLE 38 MAIZE/CORN: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 39 SOYBEAN: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 40 COTTON: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 41 WHEAT: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 42 POTATO: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 43 CANOLA: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 44 RICE: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 45 VEGETABLES: ECONOMICALLY IMPORTANT PATHOGENS, DISEASES & TREATMENT
TABLE 46 INSECTICIDE FAMILY, ACTIVE INGREDIENTS & TARGET PESTS
TABLE 47 NEMATICIDE COMPOUNDS & TARGET PESTS
TABLE 48 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES,  2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 49 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 50 EUROPE: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 51 ASIA-PACIFIC: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 52 LATIN AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES, 2009 – 2016($MILLION)
TABLE 53 ROW: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY CROP TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 54 GLOBAL SEED MARKET FOR CEREALS & GRAINS, BY CROP TYPES, 2009 – 2016($MILLION)
TABLE 55 GLOBAL MAIZE/CORN MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 56 GLOBAL MAIZE/CORN SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010($BILLION)
TABLE 57 GLOBAL RICE MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 58 GLOBAL RICE SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 59 GLOBAL WHEAT MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 60 GLOBAL WHEAT SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2016 ($BILLION)
TABLE 61 GLOBAL SORGHUM MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 62 GLOBAL OILSEEDS SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2008 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 63 GLOBAL SOYBEAN MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 64 GLOBAL SOYBEAN SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($BILLION)
TABLE 65 GLOBAL SUNFLOWER MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 66 GLOBAL MAIZE/CORN SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010($MILLION)
TABLE 67 GLOBAL COTTON MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 68 GLOBAL MAIZE/CORN SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010($BILLION)
TABLE 69 GLOBAL CANOLA MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 70 GLOBAL CANOLA SEED MARKET REVENUEBY TYPES, 2007 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 71 GLOBAL SEED MARKET FOR GRASS, ALFALFA & SUGAR BEETS, BY CROP TYPES, 2008 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 72 GLOBAL SUGAR BEETS MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 73 GLOBAL SUGAR BEET SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2007 – 2010($MILLION)
TABLE 74 GLOBAL VEGETABLES MARKET AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) & PRODUCTION (TONS), 2009
TABLE 75 GLOBAL VEGETABLES SEED MARKET, BY CROP TYPES, 2008 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 76 NORTH AMERICA: AGRICULTURAL AREA, 2005 – 2009 (MILLION HECTARES)
TABLE 77 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 78 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 79 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRY, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 80 U.S: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 81 MEXICO: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 82 CANADA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 83 EUROPE: AGRICULTURAL & ARABLE LAND, 2005 – 2009 (MILLION HECTARES)
TABLE 84 EUROPE: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 85 EUROPE: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 86 EUROPE: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRY, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 87 U.K: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 88 ITALY: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 89 FRANCE: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 90 SWEDEN: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 91 GERMANY: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 92 ASIA-PACIFIC: AGRICULTURAL & ARABLE LAND, 2005 – 2009 (MILLION HECTARES)
TABLE 93 ASIA-PACIFIC: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 94 ASIA-PACIFIC: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 95 ASIA-PACIFIC: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRY, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 96 JAPAN: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 97 THAILAND: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 98 AUSTRALIA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 99 CHINA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 100 INDIA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 101 LATIN AMERICA: AGRICULTURAL & ARABLE LAND, 2005 – 2009 (MILLION HECTARES)
TABLE 102 LATIN AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 103 LATIN AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 104 LATIN AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRY, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 105 BRAZIL: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATION, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 106 ARGENTINA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 107 ROW: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 108 ROW: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 109 ROW: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY COUNTRY, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 110 RUSSIA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 111 SOUTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
TABLE 112 MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS, 2009 – 2011
TABLE 113 NEW PRODUCTS LAUNCH & RESEARCH, 2008 – 2011
TABLE 114 PARTNERSHIPS/COLLABORATIONS/ JOINT VENTURES/AGREEMENTS, 2008 – 2011
TABLE 115 EXPANSIONS, 2010 – 2011
TABLE 116 BASF SE: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 117 BASF SE: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 118 BASF SE: ANNUAL REVENUE FOR AGRICULTURAL SOLUTION SEGMENTS, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 119 BAYER CROPSCIENCE: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 120 BAYER CROPSCIENCE: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 121 BAYER CROPSCIENCE: ANNUAL REVENUE OF FOR SEED TREATMENT BUSINESS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 122 BAYER CROPSCIENCE: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 123 CHEMTURA CORPORATION: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 124 CHEMTURA CORPORATION: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 125 CHEMTURA CORPORATION: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 126 DUPONT: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 127 DUPONT: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 128 DUPONT: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 129 LANDEC AG: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2010 – 2011 ($MILLION)
TABLE 130 MONSANTO: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 131 MONSANTO: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 132 MONSANTO: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 133 NOVOZYMES: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 134 NOVOZYMES: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEORGARPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 135 NUFARM LIMITED: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2010 – 2011 ($ MILLION)
TABLE 136 NUFARM LIMITED: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2010 – 2011 ($MILLION)
TABLE 137 NUFARM LIMITED: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2010 – 2011 ($MILLION)
TABLE 138 PLANT HEALTH CARE: ANNUAL REVENUE AND R&D EXPENSES, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 139 PLANT HEALTH CARE: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 140 SYNGENTA: ANNUAL REVENUE, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 141 SYNGENTA: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY SEGMENTS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 142 SYNGENTA: ANNUAL REVENUE OF SEED TREATMENT BUSINESS, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
TABLE 143 SYNGENTA: ANNUAL REVENUE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2009 – 2010 ($MILLION)
LIST OF FIGURES    
FIGURE 1 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SEGMENTATION
FIGURE 2 SEED TREATMENT MARKET, BY APPLICATOR
FIGURE 3 ELEMENTS OF COMMERCIAL SEED PRICE, 2010
FIGURE 4 GLOBAL SEED MARKET REVENUE, BY TYPES, 2001 – 2010 ($BILLION)
FIGURE 5 GLOBAL SEED MARKET SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2010
FIGURE 6 EVOLUTION OF SEED TREATMENT MARKET
FIGURE 7 SEED TREATMENT SOLUTIONS – EVOLUTION
FIGURE 8 IMPACT OF MAJOR DRIVERS ON GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, 2010 – 2016
FIGURE 9 PRICE TRENDS MAIZE/CORN & SOYBEAN SEEDS, 2010
FIGURE 10 IMPACT OF MAJOR RESTRAINTS ON GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET, 2010 – 2016
FIGURE 11 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY COMPANY, 2010
FIGURE 12 PATENT ANALYSIS, BY GEOGRAPHY, JANUARY 2005 – SEPTEMBER 2011
FIGURE 13 PATENT ANALYSIS, BY YEAR, JANUARY 2008 – SEPTEMBER 2011
FIGURE 14 PATENT ANALYSIS, BY COMPANY, JANUARY 2005 – SEPTEMBER 2011
FIGURE 15 GLOBAL CHEMICAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY APPLICATIONS, 2010
FIGURE 16 BIO-CONTROL SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2010
FIGURE 17 GLOBAL ORGANIC FOOD MARKET REVENUE, 2006 – 2010 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 18 STRESS EFFECT ON MAIZE PRODUCTION, 2010
FIGURE 19 TRANSMISSION PATHWAYS FOR DISEASES & METHODS OF PROTECTION
FIGURE 20 GLOBAL CROP PROTECTION MARKET SHARE, BY CROPS, 2010
FIGURE 21 GLOBAL MAIZE/CORN SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 22 GLOBAL RICE SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 23 GLOBAL WHEAT SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 24 GLOBAL SORGHUM SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 25 GLOBAL SOYBEAN SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 26 GLOBAL SUNFLOWER SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 27 GLOBAL COTTON SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 28 GLOBAL CANOLA SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 29 GLOBAL TURF, FORAGE GRASS, ALFALFA SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 30 GLOBAL SUGAR BEET SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 31 GLOBAL VEGETABLES SEED TREATMENT MARKET REVENUE, 2009 – 2016 ($MILLION)
FIGURE 32 SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY GEOGRAPHY, 2010
FIGURE 33 NORTH AMERICA: SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY COUNTRY, 2010
FIGURE 34 EUROPE: SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY COUNTRY, 2010
FIGURE 35 ASIA-PACIFIC: SEED TREATMENT MARKET SHARE, BY COUNTRY, 2010
FIGURE 36 GLOBAL SEED MARKET GROWTH STRATEGIES, JANUARY 2008 – NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 37 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET DEVELOPMENTS, JANUARY 2008 – NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 38 GLOBAL SEED TREATMENT MARKET GROWTH STRATEGIES, BY COMPANY, JANUARY 2008 – NOVEMBER 2011

E-Paper Displays: Markets, Forecasts, Technologies 2012-2022

Electronic paper technology has found its main application in the development of e-book readers, a market that has bloomed in recent years with successful devices such as the Amazon Kindle and the Barns & Noble Nook. The market for e-paper displays will reach over $8.5 Billion by 2022.

What the future holds for e-readers remains to be seen. New technologies and devices are being developed/ launched and there is stiff competition from similar devices such as tablet computers that can offer consumers alternatives with added functionality. This highlights the need for new markets to be identified, in order for electronic paper devices to continue enjoying the growth witnessed in the years since their initial launch.

E-Paper Displays: Markets, Forecasts, Technologies

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 151

The commercial success of the Amazon Kindle e-reader and the lesser yet still quite substantial uptake of e-book readers such as the iRex iLIad or the SONY PRS family have sparked up a large interest in e-paper display technologies.

E-paper displays mimic the appearance of ordinary ink on paper. Unlike conventional flat panel displays, it doesn't require a backlight to illuminate its pixels as it reflects light like paper does and can hold text and images indefinitely without drawing power. Usually, most versions can also be flexible, thinner and more robust than other display technologies.

E-paper display technologies

Out of the technologies that could be suitable for e-paper display applications, electrophoretic displays are seeing the strongest growth at the moment, particularly in e-readers. Other technologies are also being trialled however such as the FUJITSU color reader that utilizes cholesteric LCD technology.

Thermochromic, Electrochromic and electrowetting displays are already being used in a diverse range of applications from the world's first disposable display on a gift card and battery tester to indicators on batteryless, wireless switches. There is a place for all these technologies, indeed, many new ones frequently enter the scene. This report addresses appraisal of the options, company progress and commercial adoption.

Food Flavors and Ingredients Outlook 2012, 9th Edition

Food Flavors and Ingredients Outlook 2012 outlines the anticipated key drivers likely to impact the U.S. food and beverage industry in 2012. These include economic uncertainty arising from the seemingly slow pace of the U.S. economic recovery and financial woes in the Euro Zone, tenuous consumer confidence, the shrinking middle class, continued consumer frugality and trading down.

This year's report focuses more on flavor and ingredient trends across a wider range of food and beverage categories. A change from last year, it does not address sustainability, organic and natural ingredient trends, which are more appropriately covered in other, dedicated Packaged Facts reports.

Food Flavors and Ingredients Outlook

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 128

Benefits of this Report Include:
A single source providing extensive coverage of food flavors and ingredient trends expected to impact consumer food and beverage selection in 2012 and beyond
Insight into how flavor and ingredient trends are moving through retail and foodservice
An in-depth look at the new found importance and increased availability of produce, especially locally grown, both fruits and vegetables, from the perspective of growers, consumers, processors, retailers and foodservice operators

Whether or not there is a double dip recession or the Euro Zone financial crisis spills over onto U.S. shores, the economic picture for 2012 appears bleak, at best. Feeling the squeeze, both the employed and out-of-work will continue to practice the frugal behaviors adopted during the Great Recession of 2008 while also attempting to incorporate healthy food choices into their daily routines.

Seeking to overcome the boredom of extended frugality, consumers will especially value creative attempts by manufacturers, retailers, and foodservice operators to affordably introduce variety, comfort and indulgence to their taste experiences.

As in years past, the goal of this report is to identify and discuss the flavor and ingredient trends expected to have a major impact in 2012 on food consumed both at home and away.

Global Construction Doors and Windows – Market Opportunities and Business Environment, Analyses and Forecasts to 2015

Key Highlights
In 2010, the global doors and windows market valued US$XX.X billion, a decline of X.X% over 2009. This marginal decline in 2010 followed a steep decline of X.X% in 2009, which was caused by a reduction in new residential and commercial construction activities worldwide following the onset of the global financial crisis in 2008. As a result of consecutive declines in 2009 and 2010, the global market for doors and windows recorded a low CAGR of XX.XX% during the review period. Regionally, the robust demand from Asia-Pacific offset the large contraction in the North American market during the review period. Moreover, as a result of the significant growth in the Asia-Pacific market, the stagnation of the European market and the contraction in the North American market, Asia-Pacific overtook both Europe and North America to become the world’s leading market for doors and windows.

Synopsis
Top level overview of the Global Doors and Windows market
Global market environment
Doors and windows market size values at regional and country level
Profiles of top doors and windows producers globally

Global Construction Doors and Windows Market Forecast

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 263

Summary
This report is the result of extensive market and company research covering the Global Doors and Windows Market. It provides detailed historic and forecast doors and windows market values, segmented at category level; regional analysis, and analysis of the leading companies in the market.

With a combination of textual commentary, analysis, and charts, the report covers the following categories:

• Metal Doors and Windows
• Wooden Doors and Windows
• Plastic Doors and Windows

The report provides data for the historic years (2006-2010), and forecasts from 2011 through to 2015 along with growth rates. The report covers the performance of the overall Global Doors and Windows market along with the individual performances of each category. It also includes company profiles of the top doors and windows producers globally.

Scope

• Historical market size of the doors and windows market for 2006-2010 and forecast figures for 2011-2015
• Analysis of the doors and windows market at global and regional level
• Profiles of top doors and windows producers globally

Reasons To Buy

• Gain insight into the Global Doors and Windows market with current, historic and forecast market size figures
• Gain insight into current, historic and forecast market size figures at regional and country level
• Gain insight into the different categories that make up the Global Doors and Windows market
• Identify the top producers of doors and windows globally along with profiles of all those companies

Global Consumer Foodservice Survey 2011: Trends in Workplace Catering and Consumer Expenditure

“Global Consumer Foodservice Survey 2011: Trends in Workplace Catering and Consumer Expenditure” is a new survey report by Canadean that analyzes the market penetration of various catering facilities and consumer usage patterns. It also identifies the average price points for the most consumed food and drinks categories available in different workplace premises. The report also provides definitive analysis of information categorized by consumers’ age, gender and annual income. The research source in this report is based on an extensive survey between June and October 2011 taken by 27,000+ consumers of various age and income groups globally.
Scope

The report features the opinions of consumers related to the following:

• Availability of food service facilities across different workplace premises
• Frequency of food service facilities usage across different workplace premises
• Average expenditure on major food and drinks product categories across different workplace premises

Consumer Foodservice Survey

Published: January 2012
No. of Pages: 261

Price: Single User License – US$2000              Corporate User License – US$4000

                                        

Synopsis

• This report is based on primary surveys conducted by Canadean accessing its B2C panels of foodservice consumers globally. The opinions and forward looking statements of 27,000+ consumers are captured in our survey
• The geographical scope of the research is global – drawing on the activity and expectations of consumers across different foodservice channels in Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Russia, Spain, the UK and the US
• The report provides snapshots of availability of catering facilities and frequency of their usage across different workplace premises.
• The report also estimates the average expenditure on various food and drinks product categories across different workplace premises
• Key topics covered in this report include information categorized by foodservice channels and consumers’ age, gender and annual income.

Major points covered in Table of Contents of this report include

1 INTRODUCTION

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3 Workplace Catering: Global Comparison

4 Workplace Catering: Brazil

5 Workplace Catering: China

6 Workplace Catering: France

7 Workplace Catering: Germany

8 Workplace Catering: India

9 Workplace Catering: Italy

10 Workplace Catering: Russia

11 Workplace Catering: Spain

12 Workplace Catering: UK

13 Workplace Catering: US

14 Appendix

List of Tables

Request a Sample for or Inquire before buying the report @ 

http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/144702-global-consumer-foodservice-survey-2011-trends-in-workplace-catering-and-consumer-expenditure.html

Packaging Industry Outlook in Mexico: Market Size, Key Trends, Drivers, and Challenges to 2016

Executive Summary
The Mexican packaging industry has grown rapidly since 2000. It was negatively affected by the global recession in 2008, although the packaging industry appears to have recovered in 2010 and is now expected to grow steadily during the forecast period. The majority of the country’s packaging is consumed by the food and beverage end-user market, which accounted for XX% of the packaging industry market value in 2010. Mexico contains the world’s third-largest beer market as well as a huge soft drinks market, which provides a large customer base for the packaging industry. The Mexican packaging equipment industry imports the majority of its packaging machinery requirements, with imports accounting for more than XX% of the packaging machinery market value in 2010. The country’s economic growth has encouraged more foreign direct investment (FDI) to enter its packaging industry during the review period. In addition, the geographical position of Mexico as a neighbor of the US has also helped increase the industry’s attractiveness for investment.

Packaging Industry Outlook in Mexico

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 65

           

Scope
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the packaging industry in Mexico:

• It provides historical values for the Mexican packaging industry for the report’s 2007–2011 review period and forecast figures for the 2012–2016 forecast period
• It offers a detailed analysis of the key categories in Mexico’s packaging industry, along with market forecasts until 2016
• It details the different macroeconomic factors affecting the packaging industry in Mexico
• It covers an exhaustive summary on the key trends and drivers affecting the end-user markets in packaging
• Using Porter’s industry-standard “Five Forces” analysis, it details the competitive landscape in Mexico for the packaging industry
• It outlines the current regulatory framework in the industry

Reasons To Buy

• Make strategic business decisions using top-level historic and forecast market data related to the Mexican packaging industry and each category within it
• Understand the key market trends and growth opportunities within the Mexican packaging industry
• Assess the competitive dynamics in the packaging industry
• Identify the growth opportunities and industry dynamics within five key packaging categories
• Gain insights into key regulations governing the Mexican packaging industry

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Therapeutics - Pipeline Assessment and Market Forecasts to 2018

GlobalData, the industry analysis specialist, has released its new report, Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Therapeutics Pipeline Assessment and Market Forecasts to 2018. The report is an essential source of information and analysis on the global Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market. The report identifies the key trends shaping and driving the global Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market. The report also provides insights on the prevalent competitive landscape and the emerging players expected to significantly alter the market positioning of the current market leaders. Most importantly, the report provides valuable insights on the pipeline products within the global Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics sector. This report is built using data and information sourced from proprietary databases, primary and secondary research and in-house analysis by GlobalData’s team of industry experts.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Therapeutics Market Forecast

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 89



Scope

• The report provides information on the key drivers and challenges of the Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market. Its scope includes
• Annualized seven key markets (US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK and Japan) Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market revenues data from 2005 to 2009, forecast for eight years to 2018.
• Pipeline analysis data providing a split across the different phases, mechanisms of action being developed and emerging trends by seven key markets. Pipeline candidates fall under major therapeutic classes.
• Analysis of the current and future competition in the seven key countries Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market.
• Insightful review of the key industry drivers, restraints and challenges. Each trend is independently researched to provide a qualitative analysis of its implications.
• Key topics covered include strategic competitor assessment, market characterization, unmet needs and the implications for the Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market.
• Analysis of key recent licensing and partnership agreements in Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market

Reasons to buy

• The report will enhance your decision making capability. It will allow you to -
• Develop and design your in-licensing and out-licensing strategies through a review of pipeline products and technologies and by identifying the companies with the most robust pipeline.
• Develop business strategies by understanding the trends shaping and driving the global Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market.
• Drive revenues by understanding the key trends, innovative products and technologies, market segments and companies likely to impact the global Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market in future.
• Formulate effective sales and marketing strategies by understanding the competitive landscape and by analyzing the performance of various competitors.
• Identify emerging players with potentially strong product portfolios and create effective counter-strategies to gain a competitive advantage.
• Organize your sales and marketing efforts by identifying the market categories and segments that present maximum opportunities for consolidations, investments and strategic partnerships.
• What’s the next big thing in the global Venous Thromboembolism Therapeutics market landscape? – Identify, understand and capitalize.

Medical Device Companies Analysis

Medical Devices Companies Analysis (MDCA) covers over 50 major companies and subsidiaries, equivalent to more than 4,000 A4 pages.

Incorporating primary source material with Espicom's vast medical industry business database, MDCA provides a complete review of key medical device companies.

Importantly, MDCA puts medical device companies into their competitive context, allowing you to readily compare and contrast each company's strengths and weaknesses.

MDCA (Medical Devices Companies Analysis) Reports
Each report provides a full review of the company's activities, from its origins to its latest corporate activity, including mergers and acquisitions, agreements, divestitures, major purchasing contracts and litigation. Sections are included on products, international activities and R&D, as well as a full, in-depth five year financial analysis.

Medical Device Companies Analysis

Published:January 2012

Over 50 major Medical Devices Companies analysed:
3M
Abbott Laboratories
Agfa
Aloka
Analogic
CR Bard
Baxter
Becton-Dickinson
Biomet
Boston Scientific
B. Braun
Carestream Health
Carl Zeiss Meditec
Coloplast
ConvaTec
Cooper Companies
Covidien - previously Tyco Healthcare(including Kendall, Mallinckrodt, Nellcor, Puritan Bennett, US Surgical and Valleylab)
Danaher
Dräger Medical
Edwards Lifesciences
Elekta
Fresenius
Fukuda Denshi
Gambro
GE Healthcare
Getinge
Hill-Rom
Hitachi Medical
Hologic
Johnson & Johnson
(including Cordis, DePuy, Ethicon, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Independence Technology, LifeScan, Mentor, Therakos and Vistakon)
Kimberly-Clark
Kinetic Concepts
Medtronic
Nihon Kohden
Nipro
Olympus
Omron
Philips Healthcare
Roche Diagnostics
Shimadzu
Siemens Healthcare
Smith & Nephew
Smiths Medical
St Jude Medical
Stryker
Synthes
Terumo
Toshiba Medical Systems
Varian Medical Systems
Zimmer

New Emerging R&D Locations

This report examines and compares the next wave of clinical trial and drug development locations. Over the next 5 to 10 years, the countries identified in this report will become increasingly important as offshoring and outsourcing destinations.

Features and benefits

• Compare 5 new emerging R&D locations in terms of population, economic activity, healthcare infrastructure, and current R&D activity.
• Analyze how clinical trial numbers are changing in China, India, and Eastern Europe.
• Develop strategies for geographic outsourcing.
• Assess other new emerging regions and their potential.
• Evaluate cost savings of offshoring pharma R&D.

Emerging R&D Locations for Clinical Trail and Drug Development 

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages:150

Highlights
While R&D growth is still strong in the Asian and Latin American countries of China, Brazil, and India, it has stalled, or even declined, in Eastern Europe and Russia. China, Brazil, and India also have some of the lowest site densities suggesting that they still have significant opportunity for further expansion.

South Korea has a rapidly emerging clinical trial sector. Regulatory standards are high, and approval processes efficient. The expertise of South Korea in drug discovery and preclinical research, is being recognized, and the country is emerging as a destination for R&D across the entire drug development spectrum.

Qatar, Taiwan, and Cuba have great potential as R&D destinations, although they are likely to lag behind the main next-wave countries identified in the report: South Korea, Thailand, Bulgaria, Jordan, and Egypt.

Your key questions answered
Which countries will become the key outsourcing and offshoring destinations for pharma R&D over the next 5-10 years?
How do the various emerging R&D locations compare in terms of patient populations, infrastructure and regulation?
What challenges do pharma companies face in offshoring R&D?
What factors are driving pharma companies to look beyond China and India?
What other countries have the greatest potential as R&D locations?

Clean Coal Technologies Markets and Trends Worldwide, 2nd Edition

Coal is expected to continue to be a dominant fuel in power generation due to its low cost and abundance. Nearly 7 billion tonnes of coal were produced globally in 2010, and over 40% of global electricity was coal powered. On a levelized cost of production basis, the global market value of coal-fired electricity exceeded $400 billion. Nonetheless, conventional coal power generation is a leading contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions and is increasingly being regulated and disincentivized. Further, clean and renewable energy sources are beginning to challenge conventional fossil fuels.

Clean coal technologies that improve the environmental performance of coal power generation are expected to enable coal to remain an attractive fuel option well into the future. Several clean coal technologies that increase efficiency of coal power plants and reduce emissions are actively being developed and deployed to meet these challenges. As development and adoption of these technologies has increased, the global value of electricity generation using clean coal technologies has concurrently grown to $63 billion in 2010 and is further expected to grow to $85 billion by 2020.

Clean Coal Technologies Markets and Trends

No. of Pages: 242
Published:January 2012

Report Methodology

The information in Global Clean Coal Technologies and Markets is based on primary and secondary research. Primary research entailed gathering information from firms and individuals involved in development of clean coal technologies, coal production, and coal-fired electricity generation to obtain information on the developing market and factors shaping the industry. Secondary research entailed data gathering from relevant sources, including government and industry publications, company literature and corporate annual reports.

What You'll Get in This Report

Global Clean Coal Technologies and Markets contains important insights and projections regarding the future of this market around the world. The report provides both comprehensive data and analysis. Subscribers will benefit from extensive data, presented in easy-to-read and practical charts, tables, and graphs.

Global Clean Coal Technologies and Markets provides a detailed discussion of the key technologies, deployed or in development, to address the environmental impact of coal-fired electricity generation as well as broad review of the global market for clean coal technologies for coal-fired electricity generation. The global market demand for coal, electricity, and clean coal-fired electricity is quantified and projections for growth in demand are provided, along with the key factors influencing this growth in leading coal consuming nation around the world. The report includes profiles of 15 companies actively engaged in the clean coal market, and also details current and potential US employment in the sector.

How You'll Benefit from This Report

If your company is already doing business in the energy markets, or is considering entering the marketplace, you will find this report invaluable. It provides a comprehensive package of information and insight not offered in any other single source. You will gain a thorough understanding of the current global market for clean coal technologies, as well as projected markets and trends through 2020.

This report will help:

• Marketing managers understand the forces shaping global energy markets and the market for clean coal technologies and identify market opportunities.
• Research and development professionals stay on top of competitor initiatives and explore demand for clean coal technologies.
• Business development executives understand the dynamics of the market and identify possible partnerships.
• Information and research center librarians provide market researchers, product managers, and other colleagues with the vital information they need to do their jobs more effectively.

Dairy Alternative Beverages in the U.S.: Soy Milk, Almond Milk, Rice Milk and other Dairy Milk Alternatives

This report examines the U.S. market for plant-based, ready-to-drink (RTD) beverages that are alternative substitutes for dairy milk, sold to consumers at retail. These products include beverages made from plant-based ingredients including soy, almond, rice, nuts, seeds, hemp and/or a combination of grains. These beverages do not contain any dairy products. 

This report estimates and analyzes the size, growth rate, and composition of the plant-based beverage market. Historical sales data, as well as market forecasts to 2016, are provided for soymilk, almond milk, rice milk, coconut milk and hemp milk, as well as coverage of minor products such as flax, hazelnut, multi-grain, oat and sunflower milks. Strategic analyses of competitors in this market are included, as well as descriptions of recently introduced products. Trends and regulations influencing this market are discussed. Importantly, data from Packaged Facts' extensive proprietary survey of consumer attitudes and usage trends relating to plant-based beverages are provided.

U.S.Dairy Alternative Beverages

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 212

Plant-based milks have a long history in both Eastern and Western cultures, with references found in early European cookbooks as well as Oriental literature from the 1500s. Derived from soy, oats, nuts, seeds, legumes, hemp, rice and others, plant milk is a generalized term without legal description or qualifiers. There are a number of varieties of plant milks offered in the retail market, and there are other plant milks not yet produced commercially that have the potential to impact the market in the future. Some of these milks are produced commercially in other countries and could possibly enter the U.S. market in the future.

Consumers choose plant-based dairy alternative beverages for numerous reasons. Health issues including lactose intolerance, milk allergy, and the genetic disorder phenylketonuria (PKU) can be addressed through the consumption of dairy alternative beverages because these plant-based milks are free of animal proteins, in particular casein. Others who are primary consumers of dairy alternative beverages include vegans, vegetarians and people concerned about antibiotics or growth hormones often found in cow's milk.

Currently, the most commonly known and popular of the commercial plant milks is soymilk. Following in consumer recognition and consumption are almond milk, rice milk and coconut milk, in that order of preference. Additionally, hemp milk, oat milk, hazelnut milk, flax milk, sunflower milk and multigrain milk are available at the retail level, although they enjoy only a very minor market share. Quinoa, lupine, pea, peanut, cashew, and sesame are also used to make RTD plant-based milks in countries other than the United States. These products carry the potential to enter the U.S. market at a later date on a commercial scale, either through domestic production or importation.

Microcontroller Market to 2015 - Commissioning of Smart Grid Projects to Create Market Opportunities in Advanced Metering Infrastructure and Grid Equipment

GBI Research's new report, “Microcontroller Market to 2015 - Commissioning of Smart Grid Projects to Create Market Opportunities in Advanced Metering Infrastructure and Grid Equipment” provides key information and analysis on the market opportunities in the global microcontroller industry. The report covers the latest information on the revenue and volume of the microcontrollers market. The report provides product - based, region -based and end-use based forecasts up to 2015. Microcontroller usage in smart grid sector is increasing, as they provide greater reliability in power generation. Various devices and equipment contain microcontrollers and the report discusses their role and also gives a detailed market revenue breakdown along with the key players and their market shares.

Microcontroller Market

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 120

Commissioning of Smart Grid Projects to Create Demand for Microcontroller-Based Products

The global smart grid sector was a $35 billion industry in 2011, with revenues coming from different segments, such as Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), IT and communication, grid security, advanced transmission, and energy storage. AMI mainly includes smart meters and other networking infrastructure required to connect the grid with the customers. Microcontrollers (MCUs) form the core of these smart meters which are used for various purposes, such as gas, water, and electricity monitoring. The cumulative global market for smart grids during 2011-2015 is expected to be around $180 billion, with the investments in the market expected to double to $70 billion by 2015. This growth in smart grid investments is a major revenue source for MCUs. These investments are expected to follow the commissioning of new projects, mergers and acquisitions, alliances, private equity investments and so on, across key countries in America, Europe and Asia Pacific.

Medical Equipment Market to Open New Revenue Streams
MCUs are already being used in the medical electronics industry in the construction of products such as blood pressure monitors, handheld ultrasound systems, spirometers, pulse oximeters, heart rate monitors, and glucometers. Ageing populations in the US and the UK are dependent on government healthcare programs creating a demand for affordable, high quality healthcare solutions. This has given rise to the development of miniaturized medical equipment, which in turn will result in increased MCU sales. Healthcare expenses have also come down for the government, as remote patient monitoring and health checkups are possible due to these product developments.

Growth in Smart Card Shipments to Drive Microcontroller Market
MCU-based smart card devices achieved shipments of around 5.9 billion units in 2011, which showed a 7% increase in shipments over 2010. The major drivers for this sector are the telecom, banking, retail, government ID, and healthcare segments. Contactless smart cards that use Near Field Communication (NFC) are expected to be the next prominent driver for the market, with contactless payments through mobile phones and keyless security being the main applications. The telecom sector accounts for around 75% of the overall shipments in 2011, and a continuing growth is expected in markets such as India, China, Indonesia and Brazil.

Vision Care Devices - Global Pipeline Analysis, Competitive Landscape and Market Forecasts to 2017

GlobalData’s new report, “Vision Care Devices - Global Pipeline Analysis, Competitive Landscape and Market Forecasts to 2017” provides key data, information and analysis on the global vision care devices market. The report provides market landscape, competitive landscape and market trends information on the vision care devices market. The report provides comprehensive information on the key trends affecting the market, and key analytical content on the market’s dynamics. The report also reviews the competitive landscape and technology offerings.

This report is built using data and information sourced from proprietary databases, primary and secondary research and in-house analysis by GlobalData’s team of industry experts.

Vision Care Devices Market Forecasts

Published:January 2012
No. of Pages: 89

 

Scope

• Key geographies covered include the US, Canada, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Japan, China, India, Australia, and Brazil.
•  Key segments covered include Contact Lenses, Contact Lens Cleaning and Disinfecting Solutions and Spectacle Lenses.
• Annualized market revenues data from 2003 to 2010, forecast forward for seven years to 2017. Company shares data for 2010.
• Qualitative analysis of key market trends, market drivers, and restraints within the vision care devices market.
• The report also covers information on the leading market players, the competitive landscape, and the leading pipeline products and technologies.
• Key players covered include Essilor International, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., and CIBA Vision Corporation.

Reasons to buy

• Develop business strategies by understanding the trends and developments that are driving the vision care devices globally.
• Design and develop your product development, marketing and sales strategies.
• Develop market-entry and market expansion strategies.
• Identify key players best positioned to take advantage of the emerging market opportunities.
• Exploit in-licensing and out-licensing opportunities by identifying products that are most likely to ensure a robust return.
• What’s the next big thing in the vision care devices market landscape? – Identify, understand and capitalize.
• Make more informed business decisions from the insightful and in-depth analysis of the global vision care devices market and the factors shaping it.

Companies Mentioned:

• Essilor International Inc.
• Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
• CIBA Vision Corporation

Plastics in Electronic Enclosures: Global Markets

The surge of new electronic products, led by small and mobile computer-based devices, has resulted in significant changes in resin selection for enclosures.  Downsizing and thin walling have necessitated a reevaluation of resins because of more demanding physical-property requirements and molding challenges.  In addition, a reevaluation is also necessary for resins used in the stationary portion of the market, which includes enclosures for desktop computers and flat-panel displays.

This study analyzes new developments, particularly the complex scenario of very small enclosures, given that mobile electronic devices have become increasingly smaller and lighter.  There have also been changes in the market for stationary electronic devices, especially because of the additional protection required for power supplies within these units.

Plastics in Electronic Enclosures

Published:January 2012

No. of Pages: 231

 

REASON FOR DOING STUDY

Many past studies on resins used for electronic enclosures cited data that was outdated and, in our opinion, not valid.  FEW of these studies carefully defined the parameters.  It must also be realized that change is the mantra of the electronic industry.  NEW products are constantly being introduced, creating different issues for enclosures.

In many instances, past studies did not take into account important data generated from previous reports.  Also not take into consideration were critical factors such as the actual measurement and calculation of surface areas and weights for both stationary and mobile electronic enclosures.

The results of this study were generated from such measurements and subsequent calculations.  The report also includes careful estimates of units sold, and, finally, reasonable estimates of future units to be sold.

Report Summary

• The global market for plastics used in electronic enclosures was 6.9 billion pounds in 2011. BCC expects this market to reach 7.4 billion pounds by 2012 and to reach 9.9 billion pounds by 2017, increasing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.1%.
• The stationary electronic device segment was 6.7 billion pounds in 2011, which is expected to reach to 7.2 billion pounds in 2012. The segment is then forecast to grow to 9.5 billions pound by 2017, increasing at a CAGR of 5.9% for the five year period.
• The mobile electronic device segment was 179.1 million pounds in 2011 and is expected to reach 201 million pounds in 2012. BCC forecasts this market will further grow at a CAGR of 12.6% and will reach 363.4 million pounds in 2017.